Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1038

reference
951-tree-1
name
1038
tree-preservation-order

undefined

951-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.023391 50.876245)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.023334 50.876239,-1.023337 50.876250,-1.023345 50.876260,-1.023357 50.876268,-1.023373 50.876273,-1.023391 50.876275,-1.023408 50.876274,-1.023424 50.876269,-1.023437 50.876261,-1.023445 50.876251,-1.023448 50.876240,-1.023446 50.876229,-1.023438 50.876219,-1.023425 50.876211,-1.023410 50.876205,-1.023392 50.876203,-1.023374 50.876205,-1.023358 50.876210,-1.023346 50.876218,-1.023337 50.876228,-1.023334 50.876239)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL